<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One step closer to fewer passwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords</link>
	<description>Adventures in technology consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Probably not, and with the company&#039;s history as something to go on, your hesitation is well founded. However, given the very nature of the protocol and its liberal licensing it&#039;s hard to see how they could. I think it probably has something to do with the company attempting to portray itself as a stalwart of open standards - taking the standardization of C#, the OpenDocument format inculsion in Office and a possible recognition that a proprietary Passport has only limited usefulness. However it always pays to be wary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not, and with the company&#8217;s history as something to go on, your hesitation is well founded. However, given the very nature of the protocol and its liberal licensing it&#8217;s hard to see how they could. I think it probably has something to do with the company attempting to portray itself as a stalwart of open standards &#8211; taking the standardization of C#, the OpenDocument format inculsion in Office and a possible recognition that a proprietary Passport has only limited usefulness. However it always pays to be wary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saxsux</title>
		<link>http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>saxsux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakubkorab.net/2007/02/one-step-closer-to-fewer-passwords#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person worried that Microsoft is embracing, extending, and getting ready to extinguish OpenID?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person worried that Microsoft is embracing, extending, and getting ready to extinguish OpenID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

